The One(s) that Got Away: Third Screen Media
I was
speaking to Ben Levitan about blogging the other day and he pointed out to me
that Bessemer
really had the first blog. For years, Bessemer has kept a site
dedicated to their “anti-portfolio” or the ones that got away. Every vc
does this in an informal way, lamenting the good ones decided not to do
or did not pursue preemptively. Some of
the more data driven vcs will go back and analyze why they decided to pass on a
company that went on to achieve greatness.
I did not
make much of this conversation until I read the cover of the WSJ marketplace
section yesterday- “MSN is in Talks to Buy Provider of Wireless Ads.” After an exhaustive review of this sector, my
eyes raced down to find the name, which turned out to be a company called Third
Screen Media. And saw the latest example
of one to put in my personal anti-portfolio.
I had the privilege
of spending time with CEO Thomas Burgess about a year ago. Third Screen is a first generation mobile ad
server that as of a year ago had signed up top 40 publishers including MSFT,
CBS Sportsline, Marketwatch, TV Guide, and a variety of other major websites
for weather, news, sports. Third Screen
worked with both on and off deck content providers, generating introductions
from carriers and agencies. Third Screen is focused on the ability to target,
traffic, report, optimize for both push and pull. Historically, a majority of the business has
been on the pull side with ad tags embedded in page views, primarily for WAP
inventory (though they can serve all types). Third Screen developed a robust platform that acted as an inventory
management system for pricing, publishing, trafficking, reporting, frequency
capping, performance marketing and behavioral targeting.
There are 200M handsets in the US literally appended to a person’s body at all times. And over the past couple years, we have seen
the early emergence of killer wireless aps- ranging from SMS search to location-based
applications to mobile TV- it just felt like mobile advertising was about to
take off. Where there are eyeballs and
actions, ad dollars are sure to follow. A $45M industry in 2005, mobile advertising was far from big. But you could feel it in the air as companies
like Third Screen and its newer competitors- Ad Mob, Grey Stripe and Digital
Sidebar- began to see campaigns in the high six digits, verging on seven.
Now if I took
you back to my notes from a year ago, you would see an email that went
something like this- “Very interesting mobile ad serving company. I have only had my first meeting with the
company but there is something real and exciting here. We should move on this one quickly. One to follow!” In 2005, I think I may have used a total of 2
exclamation points in an email describing a first meeting with a company. What happened from there is a sob story every
VC has to tell… the one that got away.
Now I am not
even quite sure what Microsoft intends to pay for Third Screen as it has not
been reported. But if you assume MSFT
paid $200-$400 for Massive, which is reported to be generating revenues
<$5M, then we can only guess that a high growth company generating revenues
of $5<x<$10M probably has a nice offer on the table.
To be fair, vcs will speak about the ones that got away and then went away for good much less frequently. The unknown question is whether the pitfalls avoided make up for the ones that got away. Congrats to Third Screen.
i like bessemer's approach: http://www.bvp.com/port/anti.asp
Posted by: Jeremy | May 27, 2006 at 03:01 PM